If A Content Owner In A Multi-Claim Scenario Chooses Takedown, What Is The Resulting Action?

by

–If A Content Owner In A Multi-Claim Scenario Chooses Takedown, What Is The Resulting Action?–

–YouTube removes the video.–

–The uploader has 30 days to respond to the takedown request.–

–The video is blocked for that content owner’s territories of ownership.–

–The other content owners are notified of a pending takedown.–

Related posts:

  1. A User Uploads A Mashup Video With Scenes From Two Different Movies. You Own One Movie In The U.S. And Your Match Policy Is Monetize. The Partner Who Owns The Other Movie In The U.S. Also Has A Match Policy Of Monetize. What Policy Is Applied In The U.S.?
  2. A User Video Is Claimed By One Asset With A Policy Of Monetize Worldwide And Claimed Separately By Another Asset With A Policy Of Block Worldwide. If Both Partners Own Their Respective Assets Worldwide, What Is The Applied Policy?
  3. A Video With An Increase In Views Shows No Corresponding Rise In Revenue; Why Might This Happen?
  4. If an asset claiming a video is missing ownership in some territories, what is the default policy action?
  5. If an asset owner doesn’t set a policy in a territory they have ownership, what policy gets applied?
  6. It’s July 1 and the finance department needs revenue totals from June for accounting purposes. Where can they find the number they should use?
  7. Partner A and Partner B share ownership of an asset (in different territories). If Partner A releases a claim on a video, what happens?
  8. How Could Someone Find Their Revenue By Asset By Country?
  9. How Could You Prevent Your YouTube Video From Being Seen In Indonesia?
  10. How Might Someone Find Out Which Assets Are “Monetized In All Countries”?

Leave a Comment